On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 7:42 PM Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@xxxxxxxxxx> > > There is a typo in comment for DFS algorithm in bpf/verifier.c. The top > element should not be popped until all its neighbors have been checked. > Fix it. > > Fixes: 475fb78fbf48 ("bpf: verifier (add branch/goto checks)") > Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c > index b83a8d420520..96ba5ea6d1a6 100644 > --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c > +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c > @@ -10662,7 +10662,7 @@ static int check_return_code(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) > * 3 let S be a stack > * 4 S.push(v) > * 5 while S is not empty > - * 6 t <- S.pop() > + * 6 t <- S.top() Even with this fix the comment is not quite accurate. I wonder whether we should keep it or delete it completely. At least please use 'peek' instead of 'top'.