在 2022/10/13 9:51, Martin KaFai Lau 写道:
On 10/11/22 2:57 AM, Wang Yufen wrote:
The program file used in the udpgro_frglist testcase is
"../bpf/nat6to4.o",
but the actual nat6to4.o file is in "bpf/" not "../bpf".
The following error occurs:
Error opening object ../bpf/nat6to4.o: No such file or directory
hmm... so it sounds like the test never works...
The test seems like mostly exercising the tc-bpf? It makes sense to
move it to the selftests/bpf. or staying in net is also fine for now
and only need to fix up the path here.
However, if moving to selftests/bpf, I don't think it is a good idea
to only move the bpf prog but not moving the actual test program (the
script here) such that the bpf CI can continuously testing it.
Otherwise, it will just drift and rot slowly like patch 2.
Also, if you prefer to move it to selftests/bpf, the bpf prog cannot
be moved in the current form. eg. There is some convention on the SEC
name in the selftests/bpf/progs. Also, the testing script needs to be
adapted to the selftests/bpf/test_progs infra.
hmm... if moving to selftests/bpf, the actual test programs also needs
to move to selftests/bpf, e.g. udpgso_bench_*, in_netns.sh, udpgso*.sh,
which may not be a good idea.
So, only fix up the path here.
Also fix up the bpf/nat6to4.o compile error as following:
make -C tools/testing/selftests/net got the following err:
bpf/nat6to4.c:43:10: fatal error: 'bpf/bpf_helpers.h' file not found
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
