Re: [RFC Patch v6 0/5] net_sched: introduce eBPF based Qdisc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/05, Cong Wang wrote:
From: Cong Wang <cong.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

This *incomplete* patchset introduces a programmable Qdisc with eBPF.

There are a few use cases:

1. Allow customizing Qdisc's in an easier way. So that people don't
    have to write a complete Qdisc kernel module just to experiment
    some new queuing theory.

2. Solve EDT's problem. EDT calcuates the "tokens" in clsact which
    is before enqueue, it is impossible to adjust those "tokens" after
    packets get dropped in enqueue. With eBPF Qdisc, it is easy to
    be solved with a shared map between clsact and sch_bpf.

3. Replace qevents, as now the user gains much more control over the
    skb and queues.

4. Provide a new way to reuse TC filters. Currently TC relies on filter
    chain and block to reuse the TC filters, but they are too complicated
    to understand. With eBPF helper bpf_skb_tc_classify(), we can invoke
    TC filters on _any_ Qdisc (even on a different netdev) to do the
    classification.

5. Potentially pave a way for ingress to queue packets, although
    current implementation is still only for egress.

6. Possibly pave a way for handling TCP protocol in TC, as rbtree itself
    is already used by TCP to handle TCP retransmission.

7. Potentially pave a way for implementing eBPF based CPU scheduler,
    because we already have task kptr and CFS is clearly based on rbtree
    too.

The goal here is to make this Qdisc as programmable as possible,
that is, to replace as many existing Qdisc's as we can, no matter
in tree or out of tree. This is why I give up on PIFO which has
serious limitations on the programmablity. More importantly, with
rbtree, it is easy to implement PIFO logic too.

Here is a summary of design decisions I made:

[..]

1. Avoid eBPF struct_ops, as it would be really hard to program
    a Qdisc with this approach, literally all the struct Qdisc_ops
    and struct Qdisc_class_ops are needed to implement. This is almost
    as hard as programming a Qdisc kernel module.

Can you expand more on what's exactly 'hard'? We need to override
enqueue/dequeue mostly and that's it?

Does it make sense to at least do, say, sch_struct_opts? Maybe we can
have some higher level struct_opts with enqueue/dequeue only for
bpf to override?

2. Introduce a generic rbtree map, which supports kptr, so that skb's
    can be stored inside.

There has been several rbtree proposals. Do we really need an rbtree
here (ignoring performance)? Can we demonstrate these new qdisc
capabilities with a hashtable?

    a) As eBPF maps are not directly visible to the kernel, we have to
    dump the stats via eBPF map API's instead of netlink.

b) The user-space is not allowed to read the entire packets, only __sk_buff itself is readable, because we don't have such a use case yet and it would require a different API to read the data, as map values have fixed length.

[..]

    c) Multi-queue support is implemented via map-in-map, in a similar
    push/pop fasion based on rbtree too.

I took a brief look at sch_bpf.c and I don't see how that would work.
Can you expand more on that (+locking)?

Also, in sch_bpf.c, you care about classid, why? Isn't the whole purpose
of the series is to expand tc capabilities? Why are we still dragging
this classid?


    d) Use the netdevice notifier to reset the packets inside skb map upon
    NETDEV_DOWN event. (TODO: need to recognize kptr type)

[..]

3. Integrate with existing TC infra. For example, if the user doesn't want
to implement her own filters (e.g. a flow dissector), she should be able to re-use the existing TC filters. Another helper bpf_skb_tc_classify() is
    introduced for this purpose.

Supposedly, the idea is that bpf can implement all existing policies +
more, so why are we trying to re-use existing filters?

Any high-level feedback is welcome. Please kindly ignore any coding details
until RFC tag is removed.

TODO:
1. actually test it
2. write a document for this Qdisc

[..]

3. add test cases and sample code

I'd start with that; otherwise, it's not clear what are the current
capabilities.

Cc: Toke H�iland-J�rgensen <toke@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <cong.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
v6: switch to kptr based approach

v5: mv kernel/bpf/skb_map.c net/core/skb_map.c
     implement flow map as map-in-map
     rename bpf_skb_tc_classify() and move it to net/sched/cls_api.c
     clean up eBPF qdisc program context

v4: get rid of PIFO, use rbtree directly

v3: move priority queue from sch_bpf to skb map
     introduce skb map and its helpers
     introduce bpf_skb_classify()
     use netdevice notifier to reset skb's
     Rebase on latest bpf-next

v2: Rebase on latest net-next
     Make the code more complete (but still incomplete)

Cong Wang (5):
   bpf: Introduce rbtree map
   bpf: Add map in map support to rbtree
   net_sched: introduce eBPF based Qdisc
   net_sched: Add kfuncs for storing skb
   net_sched: Introduce helper bpf_skb_tc_classify()

  include/linux/bpf.h            |   4 +
  include/linux/bpf_types.h      |   4 +
  include/uapi/linux/bpf.h       |  19 ++
  include/uapi/linux/pkt_sched.h |  17 +
  kernel/bpf/Makefile            |   2 +-
  kernel/bpf/rbtree.c            | 603 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  kernel/bpf/syscall.c           |   7 +
  net/core/filter.c              |  27 ++
  net/sched/Kconfig              |  15 +
  net/sched/Makefile             |   1 +
  net/sched/cls_api.c            |  69 ++++
  net/sched/sch_bpf.c            | 564 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  12 files changed, 1331 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
  create mode 100644 kernel/bpf/rbtree.c
  create mode 100644 net/sched/sch_bpf.c

--
2.34.1





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux