On Wed, 5 Oct 2022 16:19:30 +0200 Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > >> Since you mentioned it... FWIW that was always my preference rather than > >> the BTF magic :) The jited image would have to be per-driver like we > >> do for BPF offload but that's easy to do from the technical > >> perspective (I doubt many deployments bind the same prog to multiple > >> HW devices).. > > On the technical side we do have the ifindex that can be passed along > which is currently used for getting XDP hardware offloading to work. > But last time I tried this, I failed due to BPF tail call maps. FWIW the tail call map should be solvable by enforcing that the map is also pinned and so are all the programs in it. Perhaps I find that less ugly than others.. since that's what the offload path did :) > (It's not going to fly for other reasons, see redirect below).
