2022-10-06 05:24:52 GMT+0100 ~ Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx> > Relax bpf_doc.py's expectation of all BPF_FUNC_xxx enumerators having > sequential values increasing by one. Instead, only make sure that > relative order of BPF helper descriptions in comments matches > enumerators definitions order. > > Also additionally make sure that helper IDs are not duplicated. > > And also make sure that for cases when we have multiple descriptions for > the same BPF helper (e.g., for bpf_get_socket_cookie()), all such > descriptions are grouped together. > > Such checks should capture all the same (and more) issues in upstream > UAPI headers, but also handle backported kernels correctly. > > Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx> The changes look good to me, all checks seem to work as described on my setup. Nice to validate that multiple descriptions for a helper come together. Thanks! Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
