On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 5:33 PM <sdf@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 10/04, Stanislav Fomichev wrote: > > We're having an issue where we have a recent clang that seems > > to generate kind_flag for enums (aka, adding signed/unsigned). > > Trying to install a module on a kernel that doesn't have commit > > 6089fb325cf7 ("bpf: Add btf enum64 support") returns the following: > > > [ 3.176954] BPF:Invalid btf_info kind_flag > > > The enum that it complains about doesn't seem to have anything special > > except having a sign: > > > [1721] ENUM 'perf_event_state' encoding=SIGNED size=4 vlen=6 > > 'PERF_EVENT_STATE_DEAD' val=-4 > > 'PERF_EVENT_STATE_EXIT' val=-3 > > 'PERF_EVENT_STATE_ERROR' val=-2 > > 'PERF_EVENT_STATE_OFF' val=-1 > > 'PERF_EVENT_STATE_INACTIVE' val=0 > > 'PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE' val=1 > > > We are not currently using CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF_MODULES and > > don't plan to use module BTF, so it's preferable to be able > > to explicits disable it in the kernel config. Unfortunately, > > because that kconfig option doesn't have a name, it's not > > possible to flip it independently from CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF. > > Let's add a name to make sure module BTF is user-controllable. > > [..] > > > (Not sure, but maybe the right fix is to also have a stable patch > > to relax that "Invalid btf_info kind_flag" check?) > > Answering to myself, looks like we do need the following for > non-enum64-compatible older/stable kernels: > > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c > index 3cfba41a0829..928f4955090a 100644 > --- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c > +++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c > @@ -3301,11 +3301,6 @@ static s32 btf_enum_check_meta(struct > btf_verifier_env *env, > return -EINVAL; > } > > - if (btf_type_kflag(t)) { > - btf_verifier_log_type(env, t, "Invalid btf_info kind_flag"); > - return -EINVAL; > - } > - > if (t->size > 8 || !is_power_of_2(t->size)) { > btf_verifier_log_type(env, t, "Unexpected size"); > return -EINVAL; > > Anything I'm missing? Feels like any pre-6089fb325cf7 ("bpf: Add btf > enum64 support") kernel will have an issue with a recent clang > that puts sign into kflag? > > > > Fixes: 5f9ae91f7c0d ("kbuild: Build kernel module BTFs if BTF is enabled > > and pahole supports it") > > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > lib/Kconfig.debug | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug > > index c77fe36bb3d8..6336a697c9f5 100644 > > --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug > > +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug > > @@ -326,6 +326,7 @@ config PAHOLE_HAS_SPLIT_BTF > > def_bool $(success, test `$(PAHOLE) --version | sed > > -E 's/v([0-9]+)\.([0-9]+)/\1\2/'` -ge "119") > > > config DEBUG_INFO_BTF_MODULES > > + bool "Generate BTF module typeinfo" > > def_bool y > > depends on DEBUG_INFO_BTF && MODULES && PAHOLE_HAS_SPLIT_BTF > > help Not quite following. Are you saying instead of backporting enum64 support to older kernels you'd prefer to add this patch to upstream and backport this smaller patch?