[PATCH] net/ieee802154: reject zero-sized raw_sendmsg()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



syzbot is hitting skb_assert_len() warning at raw_sendmsg() for ieee802154
socket. What commit dc633700f00f726e ("net/af_packet: check len when
min_header_len equals to 0") does also applies to ieee802154 socket.

Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=5ea725c25d06fb9114c4
Reported-by: syzbot <syzbot+5ea725c25d06fb9114c4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: fd1894224407c484 ("bpf: Don't redirect packets with invalid pkt_len")
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
I checked that reproducer no longer hits skb_assert_len() warning, but
what return value should we use? Is -EDESTADDRREQ better than -EINVAL?

 net/ieee802154/socket.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/ieee802154/socket.c b/net/ieee802154/socket.c
index 7889e1ef7fad..cbd0e2ac4ffe 100644
--- a/net/ieee802154/socket.c
+++ b/net/ieee802154/socket.c
@@ -251,6 +251,9 @@ static int raw_sendmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t size)
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 	}
 
+	if (!size)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	lock_sock(sk);
 	if (!sk->sk_bound_dev_if)
 		dev = dev_getfirstbyhwtype(sock_net(sk), ARPHRD_IEEE802154);
-- 
2.34.1




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux