This patch adds support for the following pattern:
struct some_data *data = bpf_ringbuf_reserve(&ringbuf, sizeof(struct some_data, 0));
if (!data)
return;
bpf_map_lookup_elem(&another_map, &data->some_field);
bpf_ringbuf_submit(data);
Currently the verifier does not consider bpf_ringbuf_reserve's
PTR_TO_MEM | MEM_ALLOC ret type a valid key input to bpf_map_lookup_elem.
Since PTR_TO_MEM is by definition a valid region of memory, it is safe
to use it as a key for lookups.
Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@xxxxxx>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx>
---
v2->v3: lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220914123600.927632-1-davemarchevsky@xxxxxx
* Add Yonghong ack, rebase
v1->v2: lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220912101106.2765921-1-davemarchevsky@xxxxxx
* Move test changes into separate patch - patch 2 in this series.
(Kumar, Yonghong). That patch's changelog enumerates specific
changes from v1
* Remove PTR_TO_MEM addition from this patch - patch 1 (Yonghong)
* I don't have a usecase for PTR_TO_MEM w/o MEM_ALLOC
* Add "if (!data)" error check to example pattern in this patch
(Yonghong)
* Remove patch 2 from v1's series, which removed map_key_value_types
as it was more-or-less duplicate of mem_types
* Now that PTR_TO_MEM isn't added here, more differences between
map_key_value_types and mem_types, and no usecase for PTR_TO_BUF,
so drop for now.
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 6f6d2d511c06..97351ae3e7a7 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -5641,6 +5641,7 @@ static const struct bpf_reg_types map_key_value_types = {
PTR_TO_PACKET_META,
PTR_TO_MAP_KEY,
PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE,
+ PTR_TO_MEM | MEM_ALLOC,
},
};
--
2.30.2
