Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf/btf: Use btf_type_str() whenever possible

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/13/22 7:13 PM, Peilin Ye wrote:
From: Peilin Ye <peilin.ye@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

We have btf_type_str().  Use it whenever possible in btf.c, instead of
"btf_kind_str[BTF_INFO_KIND(t->info)]".

Signed-off-by: Peilin Ye <peilin.ye@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  kernel/bpf/btf.c | 14 +++++++-------
  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
index cad4657ba2ce..81dc7423d723 100644

This clean up makes sense. The patch cannot be applied though [0], so it is marked as 'Changes Requested'. Also, where is the cad4657ba2ce coming from? It can't be found in the bpf-next tree. Please rebase on the bpf-next and resend.


[0]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20220914021328.17039-1-yepeilin.cs@xxxxxxxxx/



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux