Re: [bpf-next 2/2] libbpf: Add pathname_concat() helper

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/09, Wang Yufen wrote:
Move snprintf and len check to common helper pathname_concat() to make the
code simpler.

Signed-off-by: Wang Yufen <wangyufen@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++--------------------------------
  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
index 5854b92..238a03e 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
@@ -2096,20 +2096,31 @@ static bool get_map_field_int(const char *map_name, const struct btf *btf,
  	return true;
  }

-static int build_map_pin_path(struct bpf_map *map, const char *path)
+static int pathname_concat(const char *path, const char *name, char *buf)
  {
-	char buf[PATH_MAX];
  	int len;

-	if (!path)
-		path = "/sys/fs/bpf";
-
-	len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path, bpf_map__name(map));
+	len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path, name);
  	if (len < 0)
  		return -EINVAL;
  	else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
  		return -ENAMETOOLONG;

+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int build_map_pin_path(struct bpf_map *map, const char *path)
+{
+	char buf[PATH_MAX];
+	int err;
+
+	if (!path)
+		path = "/sys/fs/bpf";
+
+	err = pathname_concat(path, bpf_map__name(map), buf);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
  	return bpf_map__set_pin_path(map, buf);
  }

@@ -7959,17 +7970,8 @@ int bpf_object__pin_maps(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *path)
  			continue;

  		if (path) {
-			int len;
-
-			len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
-				       bpf_map__name(map));
-			if (len < 0) {
-				err = -EINVAL;
-				goto err_unpin_maps;
-			} else if (len >= PATH_MAX) {
-				err = -ENAMETOOLONG;

[..]

+			if (pathname_concat(path, bpf_map__name(map), buf))
  				goto err_unpin_maps;
-			}

You're breaking error reporting here and in a bunch of other places.
Should be:

err = pathname_concat();
if (err)
	goto err_unpin_maps;

I have the same attitude towards this patch as the first one in the
series: not worth it. Nothing is currently broken, the code as is relatively
readable, this version is not much simpler, it just looks slightly different
taste-wise..

How about this: if you really want to push this kind of cleanup, send
selftests that exercise all these error cases? :-)


  			sanitize_pin_path(buf);
  			pin_path = buf;
  		} else if (!map->pin_path) {
@@ -8007,14 +8009,9 @@ int bpf_object__unpin_maps(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *path)
  		char buf[PATH_MAX];

  		if (path) {
-			int len;
-
-			len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
-				       bpf_map__name(map));
-			if (len < 0)
-				return libbpf_err(-EINVAL);
-			else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
-				return libbpf_err(-ENAMETOOLONG);
+			err = pathname_concat(path, bpf_map__name(map), buf);
+			if (err)
+				return err;
  			sanitize_pin_path(buf);
  			pin_path = buf;
  		} else if (!map->pin_path) {
@@ -8032,6 +8029,7 @@ int bpf_object__unpin_maps(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *path)
  int bpf_object__pin_programs(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *path)
  {
  	struct bpf_program *prog;
+	char buf[PATH_MAX];
  	int err;

  	if (!obj)
@@ -8043,17 +8041,8 @@ int bpf_object__pin_programs(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *path)
  	}

  	bpf_object__for_each_program(prog, obj) {
-		char buf[PATH_MAX];
-		int len;
-
-		len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path, prog->name);
-		if (len < 0) {
-			err = -EINVAL;
+		if (pathname_concat(path, prog->name, buf))
  			goto err_unpin_programs;
-		} else if (len >= PATH_MAX) {
-			err = -ENAMETOOLONG;
-			goto err_unpin_programs;
-		}

  		err = bpf_program__pin(prog, buf);
  		if (err)
@@ -8064,13 +8053,7 @@ int bpf_object__pin_programs(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *path)

  err_unpin_programs:
  	while ((prog = bpf_object__prev_program(obj, prog))) {
-		char buf[PATH_MAX];
-		int len;
-
-		len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path, prog->name);
-		if (len < 0)
-			continue;
-		else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
+		if (pathname_concat(path, prog->name, buf))
  			continue;

  		bpf_program__unpin(prog, buf);
@@ -8089,13 +8072,10 @@ int bpf_object__unpin_programs(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *path)

  	bpf_object__for_each_program(prog, obj) {
  		char buf[PATH_MAX];
-		int len;

-		len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path, prog->name);
-		if (len < 0)
-			return libbpf_err(-EINVAL);
-		else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
-			return libbpf_err(-ENAMETOOLONG);
+		err = pathname_concat(path, prog->name, buf);
+		if (err)
+			return libbpf_err(err);

  		err = bpf_program__unpin(prog, buf);
  		if (err)
--
1.8.3.1




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux