Re: [RFCv2 PATCH bpf-next 01/18] bpf: Add verifier support for custom callback return range

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/6/22 4:42 PM, Dave Marchevsky wrote:
On 9/1/22 5:01 PM, Joanne Koong wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 11:03 AM Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@xxxxxx> wrote:

Verifier logic to confirm that a callback function returns 0 or 1 was
added in commit 69c087ba6225b ("bpf: Add bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper").
At the time, callback return value was only used to continue or stop
iteration.

In order to support callbacks with a broader return value range, such as
those added further in this series, add a callback_ret_range to
bpf_func_state. Verifier's helpers which set in_callback_fn will also
set the new field, which the verifier will later use to check return
value bounds.

Default to tnum_range(0, 1) instead of using tnum_unknown as a sentinel
value as the latter would prevent the valid range (0, U64_MAX) being
used.

Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@xxxxxx>
---
  include/linux/bpf_verifier.h | 1 +
  kernel/bpf/verifier.c        | 4 +++-
  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
index 2e3bad8640dc..9c017575c034 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
@@ -237,6 +237,7 @@ struct bpf_func_state {
          */
         u32 async_entry_cnt;
         bool in_callback_fn;
+       struct tnum callback_ret_range;
         bool in_async_callback_fn;

         /* The following fields should be last. See copy_func_state() */
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 9bef8b41e737..68bfa7c28048 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -1745,6 +1745,7 @@ static void init_func_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
         state->callsite = callsite;
         state->frameno = frameno;
         state->subprogno = subprogno;
+       state->callback_ret_range = tnum_range(0, 1);
         init_reg_state(env, state);
         mark_verifier_state_scratched(env);
  }
@@ -6879,6 +6880,7 @@ static int set_find_vma_callback_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
         __mark_reg_not_init(env, &callee->regs[BPF_REG_4]);
         __mark_reg_not_init(env, &callee->regs[BPF_REG_5]);
         callee->in_callback_fn = true;
+       callee->callback_ret_range = tnum_range(0, 1);

Thanks for removing this restriction for callback functions!

One quick question: is this line above needed? I think in
__check_func_call, we always call init_func_state() first before
calling set_find_vma_callback_state(), so after the init_func_state()
call, the callee->callback_ret_range will already be set to
tnum_range(0,1).


You're right, it's not strictly necessary. I think that the default range being
tnum_range(0, 1) - although necessary for backwards compat - is unintuitive. So
decided to be explicit with existing callbacks so folks didn't have to go
searching for the default to understand what the ret_range is, and it's more
obvious that callback_ret_range should be changed if existing helper code is
reused.

Maybe then it's better to keep callback_ret_range as range(0,0)
in init_func_state() to nudge/force other places to set it explicitly ?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux