On Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 04:41:28PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote: > On 9/2/22 4:35 PM, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote: > > On Sep 02, Daniel Borkmann wrote: > > > On 9/1/22 6:43 PM, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote: > > > > Introduce bpf_ct_set_nat_info kfunc helper in order to set source and > > > > destination nat addresses/ports in a new allocated ct entry not inserted > > > > in the connection tracking table yet. > > > > Introduce support for per-parameter trusted args. > > > > > > > > Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi (2): > > > > bpf: Add support for per-parameter trusted args > > > > selftests/bpf: Extend KF_TRUSTED_ARGS test for __ref annotation > > > > > > > > Lorenzo Bianconi (2): > > > > net: netfilter: add bpf_ct_set_nat_info kfunc helper > > > > selftests/bpf: add tests for bpf_ct_set_nat_info kfunc > > > > > > > > Documentation/bpf/kfuncs.rst | 18 +++++++ > > > > kernel/bpf/btf.c | 39 ++++++++++----- > > > > net/bpf/test_run.c | 9 +++- > > > > net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_bpf.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++- > > > > .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_nf.c | 2 + > > > > .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c | 26 +++++++++- > > > > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c | 38 +++++++++++--- > > > > 7 files changed, 156 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > Looks like this fails BPF CI, ptal: > > > > > > https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/runs/8147936670?check_suite_focus=true > > > > Hi Daniel, > > > > it seems CONFIG_NF_NAT is not set in the kernel config file. > > Am I supposed to enable it in bpf-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config? > > This would have to be set there and added to the patches, yes. @Andrii/DanielM, is > this enough or are other steps needed on top of that? Yes, I think it should be set at said location. Nothing else should be needed in addition that I can think of. Thanks, Daniel [...]
