On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 4:00 PM Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > So that "enp240s0f0" or such name can be used against xskxceiver. Why not bump them up to 16 why you are at it, including MAX_INTERFACES_NAMESPACE_CHARS? In any case: Acked-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.h > index 8d1c31f127e7..12bfa6e463d3 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.h > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.h > @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ > #define TEST_FAILURE -1 > #define TEST_CONTINUE 1 > #define MAX_INTERFACES 2 > -#define MAX_INTERFACE_NAME_CHARS 7 > +#define MAX_INTERFACE_NAME_CHARS 10 > #define MAX_INTERFACES_NAMESPACE_CHARS 10 > #define MAX_SOCKETS 2 > #define MAX_TEST_NAME_SIZE 32 > -- > 2.34.1 >
