Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpf, mips: No need to use min() to get MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

On Mon, 29 Aug 2022 11:05:09 +0800 you wrote:
> MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT is 33, so min(MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT, 0xffff) is always
> MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT, it is better to use MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT directly.
> 
> At the same time, add BUILD_BUG_ON(MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT > 0xffff) with a
> comment on why the assertion is there.
> 
> Suggested-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Suggested-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next,v2] bpf, mips: No need to use min() to get MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/bbcf0f55e578

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux