Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the bpf-next tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 10:05 AM Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
<memxor@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 24 Aug 2022 at 07:00, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > In commit
> >
> >   2e5e0e8ede02 ("bpf: Fix reference state management for synchronous callbacks")
> >
> > Fixes tag
> >
> >   Fixes: 69c87ba6225 ("bpf: Add bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper")
> >
> > has these problem(s):
> >
> >   - Target SHA1 does not exist
> >
> > Maybe you meant
> >
> > Fixes: 69c087ba6225 ("bpf: Add bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper")
> >
>
> Ugh, really sorry, I must have fat fingered and pressed 'x' in vim
> while editing the commit message. I always generate these using a git
> fixes alias.

Since that was caught quickly there weren't that many commits on top.
Fixed and force pushed bpf-next.

We actually have a script that checks such sha-s. Not sure how we missed it.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux