Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 4/4] selftests/bpf: Test parameterized task BPF iterators.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 8/19/22 3:09 PM, Kui-Feng Lee wrote:
Test iterators of vma, files, and tasks of tasks.

Ensure the API works appropriately to visit all tasks,
tasks in a process, or a particular task.

Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <kuifeng@xxxxxx>
---
  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c       | 284 +++++++++++++++++-
  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_dump.c       |   2 +-
  .../selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_task.c       |   9 +
  .../selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_task_file.c  |   9 +-
  .../selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_task_vma.c   |   6 +-
  .../bpf/progs/bpf_iter_uprobe_offset.c        |  35 +++
  6 files changed, 326 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_uprobe_offset.c

[...]
+
+static pthread_mutex_t do_nothing_mutex;
+
+static void *do_nothing_wait(void *arg)
+{
+	pthread_mutex_lock(&do_nothing_mutex);
+	pthread_mutex_unlock(&do_nothing_mutex);
+
+	pthread_exit(arg);
+}
+
+static void test_task_common_nocheck(struct bpf_iter_attach_opts *opts,
+				     int *num_unknown, int *num_known)
  {
  	struct bpf_iter_task *skel;
+	pthread_t thread_id;
+	bool locked = false;

We can have a more 'kernel'-way implementation than using
'locked'.
if (!ASSERT_OK(pthread_mutex_lock(&do_nothing_mutex), "pthread_mutex_lock"))
		goto done;
if (!ASSERT_OK(pthread_create(&thread_id, NULL, &do_nothing_wait, NULL), "pthread_create"))
		goto unlock;

	...
unlock:
	ASSERT_OK(pthread_mutex_unlock(&do_nothing_mutex), "pthread_mutex_unlock");
done:
	bpf_iter_task__destroy(skel);


+	void *ret;
skel = bpf_iter_task__open_and_load();
  	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "bpf_iter_task__open_and_load"))
  		return;
- do_dummy_read(skel->progs.dump_task);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(pthread_mutex_lock(&do_nothing_mutex), "pthread_mutex_lock"))
+		goto done;
+	locked = true;
+
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(pthread_create(&thread_id, NULL, &do_nothing_wait, NULL),
+		  "pthread_create"))
+		goto done;
+
+
+	skel->bss->tid = getpid();
+
+	do_dummy_read_opts(skel->progs.dump_task, opts);
+
+	*num_unknown = skel->bss->num_unknown_tid;
+	*num_known = skel->bss->num_known_tid;
+
+	ASSERT_OK(pthread_mutex_unlock(&do_nothing_mutex), "pthread_mutex_unlock");
+	locked = false;
+	ASSERT_FALSE(pthread_join(thread_id, &ret) || ret != NULL,
+		     "pthread_join");
+done:
+	if (locked)
+		ASSERT_OK(pthread_mutex_unlock(&do_nothing_mutex), "pthread_mutex_unlock");
  	bpf_iter_task__destroy(skel);
  }
+static void test_task_common(struct bpf_iter_attach_opts *opts, int num_unknown, int num_known)
+{
+	int num_unknown_tid, num_known_tid;
+
+	test_task_common_nocheck(opts, &num_unknown_tid, &num_known_tid);
+	ASSERT_EQ(num_unknown_tid, num_unknown, "check_num_unknown_tid");
+	ASSERT_EQ(num_known_tid, num_known, "check_num_known_tid");
+}
+
+static void test_task(void)

test_task_tid?

+{
+	DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_iter_attach_opts, opts);
+	union bpf_iter_link_info linfo;
+	int num_unknown_tid, num_known_tid;
+
+	memset(&linfo, 0, sizeof(linfo));
+	linfo.task.tid = getpid();
+	opts.link_info = &linfo;
+	opts.link_info_len = sizeof(linfo);
+	test_task_common(&opts, 0, 1);
+
+	linfo.task.tid = 0;
+	linfo.task.pid = getpid();
+	test_task_common(&opts, 1, 1);
+
+	test_task_common_nocheck(NULL, &num_unknown_tid, &num_known_tid);
+	ASSERT_GT(num_unknown_tid, 1, "check_num_unknown_tid");
+	ASSERT_EQ(num_known_tid, 1, "check_num_known_tid");
+}
+
+static void test_task_tgid(void)

test_task_pid?

+{
+	DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_iter_attach_opts, opts);
+	union bpf_iter_link_info linfo;
+
+	memset(&linfo, 0, sizeof(linfo));
+	linfo.task.pid = getpid();
+	opts.link_info = &linfo;
+	opts.link_info_len = sizeof(linfo);
+
+	test_task_common(&opts, 1, 1);
+}
+
+static void test_task_pidfd(void)
+{
+	DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_iter_attach_opts, opts);
+	union bpf_iter_link_info linfo;
+	int pidfd;
+
+	pidfd = pidfd_open(getpid(), 0);
+	if (!ASSERT_GT(pidfd, 0, "pidfd_open"))
+		return;
+
+	memset(&linfo, 0, sizeof(linfo));
+	linfo.task.pid_fd = pidfd;
+	opts.link_info = &linfo;
+	opts.link_info_len = sizeof(linfo);
+
+	test_task_common(&opts, 1, 1);
+
+	close(pidfd);
+}
+
  static void test_task_sleepable(void)
  {
  	struct bpf_iter_task *skel;
@@ -212,15 +349,13 @@ static void test_task_stack(void)
  	bpf_iter_task_stack__destroy(skel);
  }
-static void *do_nothing(void *arg)
-{
-	pthread_exit(arg);
-}
-
  static void test_task_file(void)
  {
+	DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_iter_attach_opts, opts);
  	struct bpf_iter_task_file *skel;
+	union bpf_iter_link_info linfo;
  	pthread_t thread_id;
+	bool locked = false;

similar to the above, 'locked' variable can be removed
by implementing an alternative approach.

  	void *ret;
skel = bpf_iter_task_file__open_and_load();
@@ -229,19 +364,43 @@ static void test_task_file(void)
skel->bss->tgid = getpid(); - if (!ASSERT_OK(pthread_create(&thread_id, NULL, &do_nothing, NULL),
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(pthread_mutex_lock(&do_nothing_mutex), "pthread_mutex_lock"))
+		goto done;
+	locked = true;
+
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(pthread_create(&thread_id, NULL, &do_nothing_wait, NULL),
  		  "pthread_create"))
  		goto done;
- do_dummy_read(skel->progs.dump_task_file);
+	memset(&linfo, 0, sizeof(linfo));
+	linfo.task.tid = getpid();
+	opts.link_info = &linfo;
+	opts.link_info_len = sizeof(linfo);
- if (!ASSERT_FALSE(pthread_join(thread_id, &ret) || ret != NULL,
-		  "pthread_join"))
-		goto done;
+	do_dummy_read_opts(skel->progs.dump_task_file, &opts);
+
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->count, 0, "check_count");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->unique_tgid_count, 1, "check_unique_tgid_count");
+
+	skel->bss->last_tgid = 0;
+	skel->bss->count = 0;
+	skel->bss->unique_tgid_count = 0;
+
+	do_dummy_read(skel->progs.dump_task_file);
ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->count, 0, "check_count");
+	ASSERT_GT(skel->bss->unique_tgid_count, 1, "check_unique_tgid_count");
+
+	check_bpf_link_info(skel->progs.dump_task_file);
+
+	ASSERT_OK(pthread_mutex_unlock(&do_nothing_mutex), "pthread_mutex_unlock");
+	locked = false;
+	ASSERT_OK(pthread_join(thread_id, &ret), "pthread_join");
+	ASSERT_NULL(ret, "phtread_join");
done:
+	if (locked)
+		ASSERT_OK(pthread_mutex_unlock(&do_nothing_mutex), "pthread_mutex_unlock");
  	bpf_iter_task_file__destroy(skel);
  }
@@ -1249,7 +1408,7 @@ static void str_strip_first_line(char *str)
  	*dst = '\0';
  }
[...
+
  void test_bpf_iter(void)
  {
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(pthread_mutex_init(&do_nothing_mutex, NULL), "pthread_mutex_init"))
+		return;
+
  	if (test__start_subtest("btf_id_or_null"))
  		test_btf_id_or_null();
  	if (test__start_subtest("ipv6_route"))
@@ -1337,6 +1583,10 @@ void test_bpf_iter(void)
  		test_bpf_map();
  	if (test__start_subtest("task"))
  		test_task();
+	if (test__start_subtest("task_tgid"))
+		test_task_tgid();
+	if (test__start_subtest("task_pidfd"))
+		test_task_pidfd();
  	if (test__start_subtest("task_sleepable"))
  		test_task_sleepable();
  	if (test__start_subtest("task_stack"))
@@ -1397,4 +1647,6 @@ void test_bpf_iter(void)
  		test_ksym_iter();
  	if (test__start_subtest("bpf_sockmap_map_iter_fd"))
  		test_bpf_sockmap_map_iter_fd();
+	if (test__start_subtest("uprobe_offset"))
+		test_task_uprobe_offset();

uprobe_offset -> vma_offset? See below.

  }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_dump.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_dump.c
index 5fce7008d1ff..32c34ce9cbeb 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_dump.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_dump.c
@@ -764,7 +764,7 @@ static void test_btf_dump_struct_data(struct btf *btf, struct btf_dump *d,
/* union with nested struct */
  	TEST_BTF_DUMP_DATA(btf, d, "union", str, union bpf_iter_link_info, BTF_F_COMPACT,
-			   "(union bpf_iter_link_info){.map = (struct){.map_fd = (__u32)1,},}",
+			   "(union bpf_iter_link_info){.map = (struct){.map_fd = (__u32)1,},.task = (struct){.tid = (__u32)1,},}",
  			   { .map = { .map_fd = 1 }});
/* struct skb with nested structs/unions; because type output is so
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_task.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_task.c
index d22741272692..96131b9a1caa 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_task.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_task.c
@@ -6,6 +6,10 @@
char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL"; +uint32_t tid = 0;
+int num_unknown_tid = 0;
+int num_known_tid = 0;
+
  SEC("iter/task")
  int dump_task(struct bpf_iter__task *ctx)
  {
@@ -18,6 +22,11 @@ int dump_task(struct bpf_iter__task *ctx)
  		return 0;
  	}
+ if (task->pid != tid)
+		num_unknown_tid++;
+	else
+		num_known_tid++;
+
  	if (ctx->meta->seq_num == 0)
  		BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, "    tgid      gid\n");
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_task_file.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_task_file.c
index 6e7b400888fe..b0255080662d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_task_file.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_task_file.c
@@ -7,14 +7,16 @@ char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
int count = 0;
  int tgid = 0;
+int last_tgid = 0;
+int unique_tgid_count = 0;
SEC("iter/task_file")
  int dump_task_file(struct bpf_iter__task_file *ctx)
  {
  	struct seq_file *seq = ctx->meta->seq;
  	struct task_struct *task = ctx->task;
-	__u32 fd = ctx->fd;
  	struct file *file = ctx->file;
+	__u32 fd = ctx->fd;
if (task == (void *)0 || file == (void *)0)
  		return 0;
@@ -27,6 +29,11 @@ int dump_task_file(struct bpf_iter__task_file *ctx)
  	if (tgid == task->tgid && task->tgid != task->pid)
  		count++;
+ if (last_tgid != task->tgid) {
+		last_tgid = task->tgid;
+		unique_tgid_count++;
+	}
+
  	BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, "%8d %8d %8d %lx\n", task->tgid, task->pid, fd,
  		       (long)file->f_op);
  	return 0;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_task_vma.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_task_vma.c
index 4ea6a37d1345..44f4a31c2ddd 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_task_vma.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_task_vma.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
  #define D_PATH_BUF_SIZE 1024
  char d_path_buf[D_PATH_BUF_SIZE] = {};
  __u32 pid = 0;
+__u32 one_task = 0;
SEC("iter/task_vma") int proc_maps(struct bpf_iter__task_vma *ctx)
  {
@@ -33,8 +34,11 @@ SEC("iter/task_vma") int proc_maps(struct bpf_iter__task_vma *ctx)
  		return 0;
file = vma->vm_file;
-	if (task->tgid != pid)
+	if (task->tgid != pid) {
+		if (one_task)
+			BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, "unexpected task (%d != %d)", task->tgid, pid);

Let us change this to an error code like
__u32 one_task_error = 0;
...
if (task->tgid != pid) {
	if (one_task)
		one_task_error = 1;
	return 0;
}
In bpf_iter.c, we can assert one_task_error must be 0?

  		return 0;
+	}
  	perm_str[0] = (vma->vm_flags & VM_READ) ? 'r' : '-';
  	perm_str[1] = (vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE) ? 'w' : '-';
  	perm_str[2] = (vma->vm_flags & VM_EXEC) ? 'x' : '-';
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_uprobe_offset.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_uprobe_offset.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..825ca86678bd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_uprobe_offset.c

Maybe change file name to bpf_iter_vma_offset so we know the test
is related 'iter/task_vma'? the offset can be used by uprobe, but
it can be used for other purposes, e.g., symbolization.

@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2022 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */
+#include "bpf_iter.h"
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
+
+__u32 unique_tgid_cnt = 0;
+uintptr_t address = 0;
+uintptr_t offset = 0;
+__u32 last_tgid = 0;
+__u32 pid = 0;
+
+SEC("iter/task_vma") int get_uprobe_offset(struct bpf_iter__task_vma *ctx)

get_vma_offset?

+{
+	struct vm_area_struct *vma = ctx->vma;
+	struct seq_file *seq = ctx->meta->seq;
+	struct task_struct *task = ctx->task;
+
+	if (task == NULL || vma == NULL)
+		return 0;
+
+	if (last_tgid != task->tgid)
+		unique_tgid_cnt++;
+	last_tgid = task->tgid;
+
+	if (task->tgid != pid)
+		return 0;
+
+	if (vma->vm_start <= address && vma->vm_end > address) {
+		offset = address - vma->vm_start + (vma->vm_pgoff << 12);
+		BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, "OK\n");
+	}
+	return 0;
+}



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux