Hello:
This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>:
On Tue, 23 Aug 2022 15:25:50 -0700 you wrote:
> Apparently, only a small subset of cgroup hooks actually falls
> back to cgroup_base_func_proto. This leads to unexpected result
> where not all cgroup helpers have bpf_{g,s}et_retval.
>
> It's getting harder and harder to manage which helpers are exported
> to which hooks. We now have the following call chains:
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf-next,v5,1/5] bpf: Introduce cgroup_{common,current}_func_proto
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/dea6a4e17013
- [bpf-next,v5,2/5] bpf: Use cgroup_{common,current}_func_proto in more hooks
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/bed89185af0d
- [bpf-next,v5,3/5] bpf: expose bpf_strtol and bpf_strtoul to all program types
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/8a67f2de9b1d
- [bpf-next,v5,4/5] bpf: update bpf_{g,s}et_retval documentation
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/2172fb8007ea
- [bpf-next,v5,5/5] selftests/bpf: Make sure bpf_{g,s}et_retval is exposed everywhere
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/e7215f574079
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
