On Thu, 18 Aug 2022 09:12:43 -0700 Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Some historic perspective: the original goal was to explicitly not > fallback to the c code. > It seems like it should be fine with this extra return code. > But let's also extend tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_flow.c > with a case that exercises this new return code? OK, will re-submit with a test. > Is it too late to also amend verifier's check_return_code to allow > only a small subset of return types for flow-disccestor program type? Well, wouldn't that be too late now? there might be progs out there with different codes. In any case, I don't think adding this is related to this series. Best, Shmulik
