On 18/08/2022 14:25, Roberto Sassu wrote: > On Thu, 2022-08-18 at 10:09 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: >> Em Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 02:09:57PM +0200, >> roberto.sassu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx escreveu: >>> From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> Sometimes, features are simply different flavors of another >>> feature, to >>> properly detect the exact dependencies needed by different Linux >>> distributions. >>> >>> For example, libbfd has three flavors: libbfd if the distro does >>> not >>> require any additional dependency; libbfd-liberty if it requires >>> libiberty; >>> libbfd-liberty-z if it requires libiberty and libz. >>> >>> It might not be clear to the user whether a feature has been >>> successfully >>> detected or not, given that some of its flavors will be set to OFF, >>> others >>> to ON. >>> >>> Instead, display only the feature main flavor if not in verbose >>> mode >>> (VF != 1), and set it to ON if at least one of its flavors has been >>> successfully detected (logical OR), OFF otherwise. Omit the other >>> flavors. >>> >>> Accomplish that by declaring a FEATURE_GROUP_MEMBERS-<feature main >>> flavor> >>> variable, with the list of the other flavors as variable value. For >>> now, do >>> it just for libbfd. >>> >>> In verbose mode, of if no group is defined for a feature, show the >>> feature >>> detection result as before. >> >> Looks cool, tested and added this to the commit log message here in >> my >> local branch, that will go public after further tests for the other >> csets in it: >> >> Committer testing: >> >> Collecting the output from: >> >> $ make -C tools/bpf/bpftool/ clean >> $ make -C tools/bpf/bpftool/ |& grep "Auto-detecting system >> features" -A10 >> >> $ diff -u before after >> --- before 2022-08-18 10:06:40.422086966 -0300 >> +++ after 2022-08-18 10:07:59.202138282 -0300 >> @@ -1,6 +1,4 @@ >> Auto-detecting system features: >> ... libbfd: [ on ] >> -... libbfd-liberty: [ on ] >> -... libbfd-liberty-z: [ on ] >> ... libcap: [ on ] >> ... clang-bpf-co-re: [ on ] >> $ >> >> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Thanks for working on this! > > Thanks for testing and for adapting/pushing the other patches! > > Roberto > Tested locally for bpftool and I also observe "libbfd: [ on ]" only. This looks much better, thank you Roberto for following up on this! Quentin