Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I like your version because it documents what the lock protecting this > field is. > > In fact should we also add && sock_owned_by_user(). Martin, WDYT? Would > that work for reuseport? Jakub S is fixing l2tp to hold the socket lock > while setting this field, yet most places take the callback lock... So how do you want to proceed? My first version of the patch with sock_owned_by_user()? David
