Similar to the earlier patch that avoids sk_setsockopt() from
taking sk lock and doing capable test when called by bpf. This patch
changes do_ip_setsockopt() to use the sockopt_{lock,release}_sock()
and sockopt_[ns_]capable().
Reviewed-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@xxxxxx>
---
net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c b/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c
index a8a323ecbb54..a3c496580e6b 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c
@@ -944,7 +944,7 @@ static int do_ip_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
err = 0;
if (needs_rtnl)
rtnl_lock();
- lock_sock(sk);
+ sockopt_lock_sock(sk);
switch (optname) {
case IP_OPTIONS:
@@ -1333,14 +1333,14 @@ static int do_ip_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
case IP_IPSEC_POLICY:
case IP_XFRM_POLICY:
err = -EPERM;
- if (!ns_capable(sock_net(sk)->user_ns, CAP_NET_ADMIN))
+ if (!sockopt_ns_capable(sock_net(sk)->user_ns, CAP_NET_ADMIN))
break;
err = xfrm_user_policy(sk, optname, optval, optlen);
break;
case IP_TRANSPARENT:
- if (!!val && !ns_capable(sock_net(sk)->user_ns, CAP_NET_RAW) &&
- !ns_capable(sock_net(sk)->user_ns, CAP_NET_ADMIN)) {
+ if (!!val && !sockopt_ns_capable(sock_net(sk)->user_ns, CAP_NET_RAW) &&
+ !sockopt_ns_capable(sock_net(sk)->user_ns, CAP_NET_ADMIN)) {
err = -EPERM;
break;
}
@@ -1368,13 +1368,13 @@ static int do_ip_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
err = -ENOPROTOOPT;
break;
}
- release_sock(sk);
+ sockopt_release_sock(sk);
if (needs_rtnl)
rtnl_unlock();
return err;
e_inval:
- release_sock(sk);
+ sockopt_release_sock(sk);
if (needs_rtnl)
rtnl_unlock();
return -EINVAL;
--
2.30.2
