Re: [PATCHv2 bpf-next 1/6] kprobes: Add new KPROBE_FLAG_ON_FUNC_ENTRY kprobe flag

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 02:40:29PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 12:10:20PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 11:57:40AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 11:15:21AM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > > > Adding KPROBE_FLAG_ON_FUNC_ENTRY kprobe flag to indicate that
> > > > attach address is on function entry. This is used in following
> > > > changes in get_func_ip helper to return correct function address.
> > > 
> > > IIRC (and I've not digested patch) the intent was to have func+0 mean
> > > this. x86-IBT is not the only case where this applies, there are
> > > multiple architectures where function entry is not +0.
> > 
> > we can have kprobe created by user passing just the address
> > 
> > in this case _kprobe_addr still computes the address's offset
> > from the symbol but does not store it back to 'struct kprobe'
> 
> Ah, this is an internal thing to record, in the struct kprobe if the
> thing is on the function entry or not?

yes, exactly.. it's flag saying the kprobe is on function entry

jirka



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux