From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx> [ Upstream commit ab9a5a05dc480f8994eddd31093a8920b08ee71d ] Seems like we missed to add 2 APIs to libbpf.map and another API was misspelled. Fix it in libbpf.map. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220627211527.2245459-16-andrii@xxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> --- tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map | 3 ++- tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_legacy.h | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map index 52973cffc20c..b6592c93a9d4 100644 --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map @@ -434,10 +434,11 @@ LIBBPF_0.7.0 { bpf_xdp_detach; bpf_xdp_query; bpf_xdp_query_id; + btf_ext__raw_data; libbpf_probe_bpf_helper; libbpf_probe_bpf_map_type; libbpf_probe_bpf_prog_type; - libbpf_set_memlock_rlim_max; + libbpf_set_memlock_rlim; } LIBBPF_0.6.0; LIBBPF_0.8.0 { diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_legacy.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_legacy.h index d7bcbd01f66f..a3503c02e4a9 100644 --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_legacy.h +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_legacy.h @@ -71,8 +71,8 @@ enum libbpf_strict_mode { * first BPF program or map creation operation. This is done only if * kernel is too old to support memcg-based memory accounting for BPF * subsystem. By default, RLIMIT_MEMLOCK limit is set to RLIM_INFINITY, - * but it can be overriden with libbpf_set_memlock_rlim_max() API. - * Note that libbpf_set_memlock_rlim_max() needs to be called before + * but it can be overriden with libbpf_set_memlock_rlim() API. + * Note that libbpf_set_memlock_rlim() needs to be called before * the very first bpf_prog_load(), bpf_map_create() or bpf_object__load() * operation. */ -- 2.35.1
