> From: Alexei Starovoitov [mailto:alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2022 11:34 PM > On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 06:59:28PM +0200, Roberto Sassu wrote: > > + > > +static int __init bpf_key_sig_kfuncs_init(void) > > +{ > > + int ret; > > + > > + ret = register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING, > > + &bpf_key_sig_kfunc_set); > > + if (!ret) > > + return 0; > > + > > + return register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM, > > + &bpf_key_sig_kfunc_set); > > Isn't this a watery water ? > Don't you have a patch 1 ? > What am I missing ? Uhm, yes. I had doubts too. That was what also KP did. It makes sense to register once, since we mapped LSM to TRACING. Will resend only this patch. And I will figure out why CI failed. Roberto
