On Wed, 10 Aug 2022 20:53:57 -0700 Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Wed, 10 Aug 2022 21:06:24 +0200 Daniel Borkmann wrote: > > The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net* tree. > > Could you follow up before we send the PR to Linus if this is legit? > > kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5089:5: warning: no previous prototype for function 'kern_sys_bpf' [-Wmissing-prototypes] > int kern_sys_bpf(int cmd, union bpf_attr *attr, unsigned int size) > ^ > kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5089:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit > int kern_sys_bpf(int cmd, union bpf_attr *attr, unsigned int size) Looking at the code it seems intentional, even if questionable. I wish BPF didn't have all these W=1 warnings, I always worry we'll end up letting an real one in since the CI only compares counts and the counts seem to fluctuate.
