Re: [PATCH bpf 7/9] selftests/bpf: Add tests for reading a dangling map iter fd

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 8/6/22 12:40 AM, Hou Tao wrote:
From: Hou Tao <houtao1@xxxxxxxxxx>

After closing both related link fd and map fd, reading the map
iterator fd to ensure it is OK to do so.

Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c       | 90 +++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 90 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c
index a33874b081b6..94c2c8df3fe4 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
  #include "bpf_iter_test_kern6.skel.h"
  #include "bpf_iter_bpf_link.skel.h"
  #include "bpf_iter_ksym.skel.h"
+#include "bpf_iter_sockmap.skel.h"
static int duration; @@ -67,6 +68,48 @@ static void do_dummy_read(struct bpf_program *prog)
  	bpf_link__destroy(link);
  }
+static void do_read_map_iter_fd(struct bpf_object_skeleton **skel, struct bpf_program *prog,
+				struct bpf_map *map)
+{
+	DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_iter_attach_opts, opts);
+	union bpf_iter_link_info linfo;
+	struct bpf_link *link;
+	char buf[16] = {};
+	int iter_fd, len;
+
+	memset(&linfo, 0, sizeof(linfo));
+	linfo.map.map_fd = bpf_map__fd(map);
+	opts.link_info = &linfo;
+	opts.link_info_len = sizeof(linfo);
+	link = bpf_program__attach_iter(prog, &opts);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_map_iter"))
+		return;
+
+	iter_fd = bpf_iter_create(bpf_link__fd(link));
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(iter_fd, 0, "create_map_iter")) {
+		bpf_link__destroy(link);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	/* Close link and map fd prematurely */
+	bpf_link__destroy(link);
+	bpf_object__destroy_skeleton(*skel);
+	*skel = NULL;
+
+	/* Let kworker to run first */

Which kworker?

+	usleep(100);
+	/* Sock map is freed after two synchronize_rcu() calls, so wait */
+	kern_sync_rcu();
+	kern_sync_rcu();

In btf_map_in_map.c, the comment mentions two kern_sync_rcu()
is needed for 5.8 and earlier kernel. Other cases in prog_tests/
directory only has one kern_sync_rcu(). Why we need two
kern_sync_rcu() for the current kernel?

+
+	/* Read after both map fd and link fd are closed */
+	while ((len = read(iter_fd, buf, sizeof(buf))) > 0)
+		;
+	ASSERT_GE(len, 0, "read_iterator");
+
+	close(iter_fd);
+}
+
  static int read_fd_into_buffer(int fd, char *buf, int size)
  {
  	int bufleft = size;
@@ -827,6 +870,20 @@ static void test_bpf_array_map(void)
  	bpf_iter_bpf_array_map__destroy(skel);
  }
+static void test_bpf_array_map_iter_fd(void)
+{
+	struct bpf_iter_bpf_array_map *skel;
+
+	skel = bpf_iter_bpf_array_map__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "bpf_iter_bpf_array_map__open_and_load"))
+		return;
+
+	do_read_map_iter_fd(&skel->skeleton, skel->progs.dump_bpf_array_map,
+			    skel->maps.arraymap1);
+
+	bpf_iter_bpf_array_map__destroy(skel);
+}
+
[...]



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux