On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 at 23:29, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 11:05:15 +0800 Hawkins Jiawei wrote: > > I wonder if it is proper to gather these together in a patchset, for > > they are all about flags in sk_user_data, maybe: > > > > [PATCH v5 0/2] net: enhancement to flags in sk_user_data field > > - introduce the patchset > > > > [PATCH v5 1/2] net: clean up code for flags in sk_user_data field > > - refactor the things in include/linux/skmsg.h and > > include/net/sock.h > > - refactor the flags's usage by other code, such as > > net/core/skmsg.c and kernel/bpf/reuseport_array.c > > > > [PATCH v5 2/2] net: fix refcount bug in sk_psock_get (2) > > - add SK_USER_DATA_PSOCK flag in sk_user_data field > > Usually the fix comes first, because it needs to be backported to > stable, and we don't want to have to pull extra commits into stable > and risk regressions in code which was not directly involved in the bug. Ok, I got it. Thanks for the explanation.
