On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 6:48 AM Lee Jones <lee@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The documentation for find_pid() clearly states: > > "Must be called with the tasklist_lock or rcu_read_lock() held." > > Presently we do neither. > > Let's use find_get_pid() which searches for the vpid, then takes a > reference to it preventing early free, all within the safety of > rcu_read_lock(). Once we have our reference we can safely make use of > it up until the point it is put. > > Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Song Liu <song@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx> > Cc: KP Singh <kpsingh@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Hao Luo <haoluo@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fixes: 41bdc4b40ed6f ("bpf: introduce bpf subcommand BPF_TASK_FD_QUERY") > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > > v1 => v2: > * Commit log update - no code differences > > kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 5 ++++- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c > index 83c7136c5788d..c20cff30581c4 100644 > --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c > +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c > @@ -4385,6 +4385,7 @@ static int bpf_task_fd_query(const union bpf_attr *attr, > const struct perf_event *event; > struct task_struct *task; > struct file *file; > + struct pid *ppid; > int err; > > if (CHECK_ATTR(BPF_TASK_FD_QUERY)) > @@ -4396,7 +4397,9 @@ static int bpf_task_fd_query(const union bpf_attr *attr, > if (attr->task_fd_query.flags != 0) > return -EINVAL; > > - task = get_pid_task(find_vpid(pid), PIDTYPE_PID); > + ppid = find_get_pid(pid); > + task = get_pid_task(ppid, PIDTYPE_PID); > + put_pid(ppid); rcu_read_lock/unlock around this line would be a cheaper and faster alternative than pid's refcount inc/dec.