Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Add BPF-helper for accessing CLOCK_TAI

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 12:06 AM Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Alexei,
>
> On Tue Jun 07 2022, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > Anyway I guess new helper bpf_ktime_get_tai_ns() is ok, since
> > it's so trivial, but selftest is necessary.
>
> So, I did write a selftest [1] for testing bpf_ktime_get_tai_ns() and
> verifying that the access to the clock works. It uses AF_XDP sockets and
> timestamps the incoming packets. The timestamps are then validated in
> user space.
>
> Since AF_XDP related code is migrating from libbpf to libxdp, I'm
> wondering if that sample fits into the kernel's selftests or not. What
> kind of selftest are you looking for?

Please use selftests/bpf framework.
There are plenty of networking tests in there.
bpf_ktime_get_tai_ns() doesn't have to rely on af_xdp.
It can be skb based.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux