On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 07:40:48AM -0400, Xu Kuohai wrote:
> From: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@xxxxxxxxxx>
SNIP
>
> It's caused by a NULL tr->fops passed to ftrace_set_filter_ip(). tr->fops
> is initialized to NULL and is assigned to an allocated memory address if
> CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_DIRECT_CALLS is enabled. Since there is no
> direct call on arm64 yet, the config can't be enabled.
>
> To fix it, call ftrace_set_filter_ip() only if tr->fops is not NULL.
>
> Fixes: 00963a2e75a8 ("bpf: Support bpf_trampoline on functions with IPMODIFY (e.g. livepatch)")
> Reported-by: Bruno Goncalves <bgoncalv@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Bruno Goncalves <bgoncalv@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
> ---
> kernel/bpf/trampoline.c | 11 +++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
> index 42e387a12694..0d5a9e0b9a7b 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
> @@ -255,8 +255,15 @@ static int register_fentry(struct bpf_trampoline *tr, void *new_addr)
> return -ENOENT;
>
> if (tr->func.ftrace_managed) {
> - ftrace_set_filter_ip(tr->fops, (unsigned long)ip, 0, 0);
> - ret = register_ftrace_direct_multi(tr->fops, (long)new_addr);
> + if (tr->fops)
> + ret = ftrace_set_filter_ip(tr->fops, (unsigned long)ip,
> + 0, 0);
> + else
> + ret = -ENOTSUPP;
> +
> + if (!ret)
> + ret = register_ftrace_direct_multi(tr->fops,
> + (long)new_addr);
> } else {
> ret = bpf_arch_text_poke(ip, BPF_MOD_CALL, NULL, new_addr);
> }
do we need to do the same also in unregister_fentry and modify_fentry ?
jirka
