On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 03:40:06PM +0200, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote: > Hi, > > This is a fix for [1]: test_probe_user fails on s390x, because it hooks > only connect(), but not socketcall(SYS_CONNECT). > > Patch 1 adds this quirk to BPF_KSYSCALL documentation. > Patch 2 fixes the test by attaching a prog to socketcall(). > > Best regards, > Ilya > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/06631b122b9bd6258139a36b971bba3e79543503.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220723020344.21699-1-iii@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > v1 -> v2: Add CONFIG_ prefix to CLONE_BACKWARDS* symbols (Jiri). > Change the type of prog_names to make checkpatch happy. > Use prog_count everywhere (Jiri). > #ifdef out handle_sys_socketcall() on non-s390x (Jiri). LGTM Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx> thanks, jirka > > Ilya Leoshkevich (2): > libbpf: Extend BPF_KSYSCALL documentation > selftests/bpf: Attach to socketcall() in test_probe_user > > tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h | 15 +++++--- > .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/probe_user.c | 35 +++++++++++++------ > .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_probe_user.c | 32 +++++++++++++++-- > 3 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.35.3 >
