On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 9:37 AM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, 22 Jul 2022 18:26:09 +0200 > Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > So, why not mark it as notrace? That will prevent ftrace from looking at it. > > > > there's still needs to be the instrument jump generated > > in order to use bpf_arch_text_poke on that > > Can you explain the background on this. Why is bpf doing text_poke on > function entries? What was the direct use case for? It's a bpf specific dispatcher. Like static_call but more dynamic and for bpf progs.
