On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 02:52:31PM +0800, Kuee K1r0a wrote:
> Replace 'then' with 'than'.
>
> Fixes: f4d7e40a5b71 ("bpf: introduce function calls (verification)")
> Signed-off-by: Kuee K1r0a <liulin063@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> index 0efbac0fd126..4da1a7c7657a 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> @@ -1167,7 +1167,7 @@ static int copy_verifier_state(struct bpf_verifier_state *dst_state,
> return -ENOMEM;
> dst_state->jmp_history_cnt = src->jmp_history_cnt;
>
> - /* if dst has more stack frames then src frame, free them */
> + /* if dst has more stack frames than src frame, free them */
Should we use plural as well, 'src frames'?
[...]
I believe the patch prefix should indicate which branch the patch targets as
well. E.g., [PATCH bpf-next]. Looks good to me otherwise.
Acked-by: Daniel Müller <deso@xxxxxxxxxx>
