Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/3] Use lightweigt version of bpftool

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 2022/7/16 1:15, Quentin Monnet wrote:
On 15/07/2022 17:56, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 7:16 PM Pu Lehui <pulehui@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Currently, samples/bpf, tools/runqslower and bpf/iterators use bpftool
for vmlinux.h, skeleton, and static linking only. We can uselightweight
bootstrap version of bpftool to handle these, and it will be faster.

v2:
- make libbpf and bootstrap bpftool independent. and make it simple.


Quentin, does this patch set look good to you?

[Apologies, the mail server has been filtering Pu's emails as spam for
some reason and I had missed the discussion :s]

Looks OK to me:
Acked-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Although I'm a bit sorry to see the sharing of libbpf between bpftool
and libbpf go away. But OK. We can maybe reintroduce it through
bpftool's Makefile or a separate include Makefile in the future.

Quentin
.

Hi, Quentin,

so much thanks for your review and ack. and apologies for not receiving your advice in time due to the misconfiguration of mail server[0]. and looking forward to your improvement for bpftool.

[0]https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220523152516.7sr247i3bzwhr44w@xxxxxxxxxx/





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux