On 2022/7/16 1:15, Quentin Monnet wrote:
On 15/07/2022 17:56, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 7:16 PM Pu Lehui <pulehui@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Currently, samples/bpf, tools/runqslower and bpf/iterators use bpftool
for vmlinux.h, skeleton, and static linking only. We can uselightweight
bootstrap version of bpftool to handle these, and it will be faster.
v2:
- make libbpf and bootstrap bpftool independent. and make it simple.
Quentin, does this patch set look good to you?
[Apologies, the mail server has been filtering Pu's emails as spam for
some reason and I had missed the discussion :s]
Looks OK to me:
Acked-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Although I'm a bit sorry to see the sharing of libbpf between bpftool
and libbpf go away. But OK. We can maybe reintroduce it through
bpftool's Makefile or a separate include Makefile in the future.
Quentin
.
Hi, Quentin,
so much thanks for your review and ack. and apologies for not receiving
your advice in time due to the misconfiguration of mail server[0]. and
looking forward to your improvement for bpftool.
[0]https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220523152516.7sr247i3bzwhr44w@xxxxxxxxxx/
