Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1] bpf: fix bpf_skb_pull_data documentation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 6:50 AM Quentin Monnet <quentin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 15/07/2022 14:43, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> > On 7/15/22 12:47 AM, Joanne Koong wrote:
> >> Fix documentation for bpf_skb_pull_data() helper for
> >> when flags == 0.
> >>
> >> Fixes: fa15601ab31e ("bpf: add documentation for eBPF helpers (33-41)")
> >> Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >>   include/uapi/linux/bpf.h       | 3 ++-
> >>   tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 3 ++-
> >>   2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> >> index 379e68fb866f..a80c1f6bbe25 100644
> >> --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> >> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> >> @@ -2361,7 +2361,8 @@ union bpf_attr {
> >>    *         Pull in non-linear data in case the *skb* is non-linear
> >> and not
> >>    *         all of *len* are part of the linear section. Make *len*
> >> bytes
> >>    *         from *skb* readable and writable. If a zero value is
> >> passed for
> >> - *         *len*, then the whole length of the *skb* is pulled.
> >> + *        *len*, then all bytes in the head of the skb will be made
> >> readable
> >
> > Quentin, should the formatting be '*skb*' instead of 'skb'?
>
> Correct
>
> > Maybe it's more clear if we speak of 'all bytes in the linear part'
> > instead of 'all
> > bytes in the head' of the skb to make it clearer? Either is ok with me
> > though.
>
> Good suggestion, “linear part” is maybe easier to understand given that
> the paragraph has no other mention the “head”.
>
Great, I'll send out v2 with these edits:
* changing skb -> *skb*
* changing "all bytes in the head" -> "all bytes in the linear part"

> Would it be worth, even, linking to e.g. Dave's doc
> (http://vger.kernel.org/~davem/skb.html) here, to provide more details?
> People reading the header file may not need that, but folks reading the
> generated man page may not be aware of what a skb contains.

In my personal opinion, I think people who are writing programs that
are using skbs will already have read that page and/or know the
internals of skbs. But I'm also happy to add that link in if you think
it'd provide more context.

>
> Quentin
>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux