> Asked you internally, but not sure I follow. Can you share more on why > the following won't fix it for us: > > https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/OSZP286MB1725CEA1C95C5CB8E7CCC53FB8869@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > ? > > The idea seems to be to get the supplied map name (from the obj) > instead of using pin name? So why is it not enough? You're correct, this approach also resolves the issue. No need for this new API.
