Hi Christoph, YongHong
On 00:01 Wed 06 Jul , Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 11:41:30PM -0700, Yonghong Song wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 7/5/22 10:00 PM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jul 3, 2022 at 10:53 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Jul 03, 2022 at 09:09:24PM +0800, Yixun Lan wrote:
> > > > > Enable this option to fix a bcc error in RISC-V platform
> > > > >
> > > > > And, the error shows as follows:
> > > >
> > > > These should not be enabled on new platforms. Use the proper helpers
> > > > to probe kernel vs user pointers instead.
> > >
> > > riscv existed as of [0], so I'd argue it is a proper bug fix, as
> > > corresponding select ARCH_HAS_NON_OVERLAPPING_ADDRESS_SPACE should
> > > have been added back then.
> > >
> > > But I also agree that BCC tools should be updated to use proper
> > > bpf_probe_read_{kernel,user}[_str()] helpers, please contribute such
> > > fixes to BCC tools and BCC itself as well. Cc'ed Alan as his ksnoop in
> > > libbpf-tools seems to be using bpf_probe_read() as well and needs to
> > > be fixed.
> >
> > Yixun, the bcc change looks like below:
>
> No, this is broken. bcc needs to stop using bpf_probe_read entirely
> for user addresses and unconditionally use bpf_probe_read_user first
> and only fall back to bpf_probe_read if not supported.
I agree with Christoph, there is something in the bcc tools that
need to adjust in order to use new bpf_probe_read_{kernel,user}
Please check the ongoing discussion [0] in the bcc tools if you're
interested in, advice and comments are welcome
[0] https://github.com/iovisor/bcc/pull/4085#issuecomment-1179446738
--
Yixun Lan (dlan)
Gentoo Linux Developer
GPG Key ID AABEFD55
