Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Correctly propagate errors up from bpf_core_composites_match

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>:

On Thu,  7 Jul 2022 21:19:31 +0000 you wrote:
> This change addresses a comment made earlier [0] about a missing return
> of an error when __bpf_core_types_match is invoked from
> bpf_core_composites_match, which could have let to us erroneously
> ignoring errors.
> 
> Regarding the typedef name check pointed out in the same context, it is
> not actually an issue, because callers of the function perform a name
> check for the root type anyway. To make that more obvious, let's add
> comments to the function (similar to what we have for
> bpf_core_types_are_compat, which is called in pretty much the same
> context).
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next] bpf: Correctly propagate errors up from bpf_core_composites_match
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/06cd4e9d5d96

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux