On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 12:00 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 10:00:42PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > > riscv existed as of [0], so I'd argue it is a proper bug fix, as > > corresponding select ARCH_HAS_NON_OVERLAPPING_ADDRESS_SPACE should > > have been added back then. > > How much of an eBPF ecosystem was there on RISC-V at the point? No idea, never used RISC-V and didn't pay much attention. But why does it matter?
