According to the RISC-V calling convention register usage here[1], a0 is used as return value register, so rename it to make it consistent with the spec. [1] section 18.2, table 18.2 https://riscv.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/riscv-calling.pdf Fixes: 589fed479ba1 ("riscv, libbpf: Add RISC-V (RV64) support to bpf_tracing.h") Signed-off-by: Yixun Lan <dlan@xxxxxxxxxx> --- I'm adding a Fixes tag here, although the original version may just work fine, and shouldn't be considered as a real error. But, the benefit is that we could make it consistent with RISC-V spec, and all other tools will follow the same usage. thanks, and let's me if there is any issue that I may not noticed.. --- tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h index 01ce121c302df..11f9096407fc4 100644 --- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h @@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ struct pt_regs___arm64 { #define __PT_PARM5_REG a4 #define __PT_RET_REG ra #define __PT_FP_REG s0 -#define __PT_RC_REG a5 +#define __PT_RC_REG a0 #define __PT_SP_REG sp #define __PT_IP_REG pc /* riscv does not select ARCH_HAS_SYSCALL_WRAPPER. */ -- 2.35.1
