Re: How about adding a name for bpftool self created maps?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 at 03:09, Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Quentin,
>
> When I using `bpftool map list` to show what maps user using. bpftool will
> show maps including self created maps. Apart from the "pid_iter.rodata",
> there are also array maps without name, which makes it hard to filter out
> what maps user using. e.g.
>
> # bpftool map list
> 63: array  flags 0x0
>          key 4B  value 32B  max_entries 1  memlock 4096B
> 65: array  name pid_iter.rodata  flags 0x480
>          key 4B  value 4B  max_entries 1  memlock 4096B
>          btf_id 98  frozen
>          pids bpftool(10572)
> 66: array  flags 0x0
>          key 4B  value 32B  max_entries 1  memlock 4096B
>
> So do you have plan to add a special name for the bpftool self created maps?
> Or do you know if there is a way to filter out these maps?

Hi Hangbin,

No plan currently. Adding names has been suggested before, but it's
not compatible with some older kernels that don't support map names
[0]. Maybe one solution would be to probe the kernel for map name
support, and to add a name if supported.

Other than this I'm not aware of a reliable way to filter out these
maps at the moment. This could probably be done in bpftool since we
should have the ids of the self-generated maps. But I think I'd rather
find a way to add map names, if possible. It would make it easier to
recognise/filter these maps on regular listing, whereas a new option
would be harder for users to discover.

Quentin

[0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAEf4BzY66WPKQbDe74AKZ6nFtZjq5e+G3Ji2egcVytB9R6_sGQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux