On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 04:59:19PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 11:17:10PM +0000, Daniel Müller wrote:
> > +int bpf_core_types_match(const struct btf *local_btf, __u32 local_id,
> > + const struct btf *targ_btf, __u32 targ_id)
> > +{
>
> The libbpf and kernel support for types_match looks nearly identical.
> Maybe put in tools/lib/bpf/relo_core.c so it's one copy for both?
Thanks for the suggestion. Yes, at least for parts we should probably do it.
Would you happen to know why that has not been done for
bpf_core_types_are_compat equally? Is it because of the recursion level
tracking that is only present in the kernel? I'd think that similar reasoning
applies here.
Thanks,
Daniel
