On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 11:28:18AM -0700, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > > +void bpf_cgroup_atype_get(u32 attach_btf_id, int cgroup_atype)
> > > +{
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +void bpf_cgroup_atype_put(int cgroup_atype)
> > > +{
> > > +}
> > From the test bot report, these two empty functions may need
> > to be inlined in a .h or else the caller needs to have a CONFIG_CGROUP_BPF
> > before calling bpf_cgroup_atype_get(). The bpf-cgroup.h may be a better place
> > than bpf.h for the inlines but not sure if it is easy to be included in
> > trampoline.c or core.c. Whatever way makes more sense. Either .h is fine.
>
> Yeah, I already moved them into headers after the complaints from the
> bot. Thanks for double checking!
>
> Let's keep in bpf.h ?
ok.
