On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 9:00 PM Casey Schaufler <casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 6/10/2022 11:50 AM, Casey Schaufler wrote: > > On 6/9/2022 4:46 PM, KP Singh wrote: > >> BPF LSM currently has a default implementation for each LSM hooks which > >> return a default value defined in include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h. These > >> hooks should have no functional effect when there is no BPF program > >> loaded to implement the hook logic. > > What I failed to point out earlier is that you really want general > LSM stacking for BPF to work the way you want it to. Reviewed-bys, Happy to take a look, but we should fix this bug independently though. > Acked-bys and other participation in that effort would be most > appreciated. >
