Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 3/5] bpf: Inline calls to bpf_loop when callback is known

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 12:27 PM Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
[...]

>
> Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  include/linux/bpf.h          |   3 +
>  include/linux/bpf_verifier.h |  12 +++
>  kernel/bpf/bpf_iter.c        |   9 +-
>  kernel/bpf/verifier.c        | 168 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  4 files changed, 183 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

[...]

> +struct bpf_loop_inline_state {
> +       bool initialized; /* set to true upon first entry */
> +       bool fit_for_inline; /* true if callback function is the same
> +                             * at each call and flags are always zero
> +                             */
> +       u32 callback_subprogno; /* valid when fit_for_inline is true */
> +};

nit: We only need one bit for initialized and fit_for_inline.

> +
>  /* Possible states for alu_state member. */
>  #define BPF_ALU_SANITIZE_SRC           (1U << 0)
>  #define BPF_ALU_SANITIZE_DST           (1U << 1)
> @@ -373,6 +381,10 @@ struct bpf_insn_aux_data {
>                                 u32 mem_size;   /* mem_size for non-struct typed var */
>                         };

[...]

> +
> +void update_loop_inline_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 subprogno)

static void ...

> +{
> +       struct bpf_loop_inline_state *state = &cur_aux(env)->loop_inline_state;
> +       struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env);
> +       struct bpf_reg_state *flags_reg = &regs[BPF_REG_4];
> +

nit: we usually don't have empty lines here.

> +       int flags_is_zero =
> +               register_is_const(flags_reg) && flags_reg->var_off.value == 0;

If we replace "fit_for_inline" with "not_fit_for_inline", we can make the cannot
inline case faster with:

  if (state->not_fit_for_inline)
      return;

> +
> +       if (state->initialized) {
> +               state->fit_for_inline &=
> +                       flags_is_zero &&
> +                       state->callback_subprogno == subprogno;
> +       } else {
> +               state->initialized = 1;
> +               state->fit_for_inline = flags_is_zero;
> +               state->callback_subprogno = subprogno;
> +       }
> +}
> +
[...]

>
> +struct bpf_prog *inline_bpf_loop(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
> +                                int position,
> +                                s32 stack_base,
> +                                u32 callback_subprogno,
> +                                u32 *cnt)

missing static

> +{
> +       s32 r6_offset = stack_base + 0 * BPF_REG_SIZE;
> +       s32 r7_offset = stack_base + 1 * BPF_REG_SIZE;
> +       s32 r8_offset = stack_base + 2 * BPF_REG_SIZE;
> +       int reg_loop_max = BPF_REG_6;
> +       int reg_loop_cnt = BPF_REG_7;
> +       int reg_loop_ctx = BPF_REG_8;
> +
[...]



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux