Re: [PATCH bpf-next v8 11/11] selftests/bpf: verify lsm_cgroup struct sock access

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 6:52 PM Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2022 at 12:02:18PM -0700, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > sk_priority & sk_mark are writable, the rest is readonly.
> >
> > One interesting thing here is that the verifier doesn't
> > really force me to add NULL checks anywhere :-/
> Are you aware if it is possible to get a NULL sk from some of the
> bpf_lsm hooks ?

No, I don't think it's relevant for lsm hooks. I'm more concerned
about fentry/fexit which supposedly should go through the same
verifier path and can be attached everywhere?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux