Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] selftest/bpf/benchs: Add bpf_map benchmark

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 10:42 AM Feng zhou <zhoufeng.zf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> +struct {
> +       __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH);
> +       __type(key, u32);
> +       __type(value, u64);
> +       __uint(max_entries, MAX_ENTRIES);
> +} hash_map_bench SEC(".maps");
> +
> +u64 __attribute__((__aligned__(256))) percpu_time[256];

aligned 256 ?
What is the point?

> +u64 nr_loops;
> +
> +static int loop_update_callback(__u32 index, u32 *key)
> +{
> +       u64 init_val = 1;
> +
> +       bpf_map_update_elem(&hash_map_bench, key, &init_val, BPF_ANY);
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +SEC("fentry/" SYS_PREFIX "sys_getpgid")
> +int benchmark(void *ctx)
> +{
> +       u32 key = bpf_get_prandom_u32() % MAX_ENTRIES + MAX_ENTRIES;

What is the point of random ?
just key = MAX_ENTRIES would be the same, no?
or key = -1 ?

> +       u32 cpu = bpf_get_smp_processor_id();
> +       u64 start_time = bpf_ktime_get_ns();
> +
> +       bpf_loop(nr_loops, loop_update_callback, &key, 0);
> +       percpu_time[cpu & 255] = bpf_ktime_get_ns() - start_time;
> +       return 0;
> +}
> --
> 2.20.1
>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux