Re: [PATCH v3] libbpf: Fix determine_ptr_size() guessing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>:

On Tue, 24 May 2022 10:44:47 +0100 you wrote:
> From: Douglas Raillard <douglas.raillard@xxxxxxx>
> 
> One strategy employed by libbpf to guess the pointer size is by finding
> the size of "unsigned long" type. This is achieved by looking for a type
> of with the expected name and checking its size.
> 
> Unfortunately, the C syntax is friendlier to humans than to computers
> as there is some variety in how such a type can be named. Specifically,
> gcc and clang do not use the same names for integer types in debug info:
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [v3] libbpf: Fix determine_ptr_size() guessing
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/8a140f1b12f7

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux