On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 3:06 PM Daniel Xu <dxu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> This commit adds a selftest to test that we can both PROG_TEST_RUN a
> kprobe prog and set its context.
nit: per Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst:
Describe your changes in imperative mood, e.g. "make xyzzy do frotz"
instead of "[This patch] makes xyzzy do frotz" or "[I] changed xyzzy
to do frotz", as if you are giving orders to the codebase to change
its behaviour.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu <dxu@xxxxxxxxx>
Other than that,
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
> ---
> .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_ctx.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++
> .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kprobe_ctx.c | 33 +++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 90 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_ctx.c
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kprobe_ctx.c
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_ctx.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_ctx.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..260966fd4506
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_ctx.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +#include <test_progs.h>
> +#include <linux/ptrace.h>
> +#include "kprobe_ctx.skel.h"
> +
> +/*
> + * x86_64 happens to be one of the architectures that exports the
> + * kernel `struct pt_regs` to userspace ABI. For the architectures
> + * that don't, users will have to extract `struct pt_regs` from vmlinux
> + * BTF in order to use BPF_PROG_TYPE_KPROBE's BPF_PROG_RUN functionality.
> + *
> + * We choose to only test x86 here to keep the test simple.
> + */
> +void test_kprobe_ctx(void)
> +{
> +#ifdef __x86_64__
> + struct pt_regs regs = {
> + .rdi = 1,
> + .rsi = 2,
> + .rdx = 3,
> + .rcx = 4,
> + .r8 = 5,
> + };
> +
> + LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, tattr,
> + .ctx_in = ®s,
> + .ctx_size_in = sizeof(regs),
> + );
> +
> + struct kprobe_ctx *skel = NULL;
> + int prog_fd;
> + int err;
> +
> + skel = kprobe_ctx__open_and_load();
> + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel_open"))
> + return;
> +
> + skel->bss->expected_p1 = (void *)1;
> + skel->bss->expected_p2 = (void *)2;
> + skel->bss->expected_p3 = (void *)3;
> + skel->bss->expected_p4 = (void *)4;
> + skel->bss->expected_p5 = (void *)5;
> +
> + prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.prog);
> + err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &tattr);
> + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_prog_test_run"))
> + goto cleanup;
> +
> + if (!ASSERT_TRUE(skel->bss->ret, "ret"))
> + goto cleanup;
> +
> + if (!ASSERT_GT(tattr.duration, 0, "duration"))
> + goto cleanup;
> +cleanup:
> + kprobe_ctx__destroy(skel);
> +#endif
> +}
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kprobe_ctx.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kprobe_ctx.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..98063c549930
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kprobe_ctx.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +#include "vmlinux.h"
> +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
> +#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
> +
> +volatile void *expected_p1;
> +volatile void *expected_p2;
> +volatile void *expected_p3;
> +volatile void *expected_p4;
> +volatile void *expected_p5;
> +volatile bool ret = false;
> +
> +SEC("kprobe/this_function_does_not_exist")
> +int prog(struct pt_regs *ctx)
> +{
> + void *p1, *p2, *p3, *p4, *p5;
> +
> + p1 = (void *)PT_REGS_PARM1(ctx);
> + p2 = (void *)PT_REGS_PARM2(ctx);
> + p3 = (void *)PT_REGS_PARM3(ctx);
> + p4 = (void *)PT_REGS_PARM4(ctx);
> + p5 = (void *)PT_REGS_PARM5(ctx);
> +
> + if (p1 != expected_p1 || p2 != expected_p2 || p3 != expected_p3 ||
> + p4 != expected_p4 || p5 != expected_p5)
> + return 0;
> +
> + ret = true;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
> --
> 2.36.1
>
