On May 30, 2022 9:33:23 PM GMT+02:00, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>On 5/27/22 5:55 PM, Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote:
>> From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> There is a small chance that get_kretprobe(ri) returns NULL in
>> kretprobe_dispatcher() when another CPU unregisters the kretprobe
>> right after __kretprobe_trampoline_handler().
>>
>> To avoid this issue, kretprobe_dispatcher() checks the get_kretprobe()
>> return value again. And if it is NULL, it returns soon because that
>> kretprobe is under unregistering process.
>>
>> This issue has been introduced when the kretprobe is decoupled
>> from the struct kretprobe_instance by commit d741bf41d7c7
>> ("kprobes: Remove kretprobe hash"). Before that commit, the
>> struct kretprob_instance::rp directly points the kretprobe
>> and it is never be NULL.
>>
>> Reported-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx>
>> Fixes: d741bf41d7c7 ("kprobes: Remove kretprobe hash")
>> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
>Steven, I presume you'll pick this fix up?
I'm currently at Embedded/Kernel Recipes, but yeah, I'll take a look at it. (Just need to finish my slides first ;-)
-- Steve
>
>Thanks,
>Daniel
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity and top posting.
